Change Details

This addresses [ENG-8089](https://linear.app/comm/issue/ENG-8089/update-socket-code-to-try-rest-endpoint-when-detecting-a-socket-crash). Most of the work here was in the reducers. Flow had very peculiar behavior, where it sometimes struggled to narrow types correctly. Where possible I avoided needed to factor things out by adding the new action types to the same top-level conditionals. If that wasn't possible, I would either factor out the logic into a function (if sufficiently complex) or copy-paste if it was really simple. When factoring out into a function, I sometimes opted for simpler parameters that would require a bit more copy-paste at the callsite. Depends on D12365

Most of the work here was in the reducers. Flow had very peculiar behavior, where it sometimes struggled to narrow types correctly. Where possible I avoided needed to factor things out by adding the new action types to the same top-level conditionals. If that wasn't possible, I would either factor out the logic into a function (if sufficiently complex) or copy-paste if it was really simple. When factoring out into a function, I sometimes opted for simpler parameters that would require a bit more copy-paste at the callsite. Depends on D12365

This addresses [ENG-8089](https://linear.app/comm/issue/ENG-8089/update-socket-code-to-try-rest-endpoint-when-detecting-a-socket-crash). Most of the work here was in the reducers. Flow had very peculiar behavior, where it sometimes struggled to narrow types correctly. Where possible I avoided needed to factor things out by adding the new action types to the same top-level conditionals. If that wasn't possible, I would either factor out the logic into a function (if sufficiently complex) or copy-paste if it was really simple. When factoring out into a function, I sometimes opted for simpler parameters that would require a bit more copy-paste at the callsite. Depends on D12365