Change Details

Fix for a regression introduced in D9010. The problem was that the previous code returned immediately which means `baseReducer` wasn't able to properly modify the state. Not a huge fun of this solution but I saw this somewhere in codebase. As an alternative, I can suggest: 1. Creating a separate reducer and running it in the same place - don't think is much better, will require the same assignment. 2. Creating separate reduce and moving this to lib. Only 2 two seems better than this, but don't want to put native-specific data in lib.

Fix for a regression introduced in D9010. The problem was that the previous code returned immediately which means `baseReducer` wasn't able to properly modify the state. Not a huge fan of this solution but I saw this somewhere in the codebase. As an alternative, I can suggest: 1. Creating a separate reducer and running it in the same place - don't think is much better, will require the same assignment. 2. Creating separate reduce and moving this to lib. Only 2 seem better than this, but don't want to put native-specific data in lib.

Fix for a regression introduced in D9010. The problem was that the previous code returned immediately which means `baseReducer` wasn't able to properly modify the state. Not a huge funan of this solution but I saw this somewhere in the codebase. As an alternative, I can suggest: 1. Creating a separate reducer and running it in the same place - don't think is much better, will require the same assignment. 2. Creating separate reduce and moving this to lib. Only 2 two seems better than this, but don't want to put native-specific data in lib.