Change Details

Pretty straightforward, the `UpdateFarcasterMessageData` variant includes `creatorFID` and `targetFID`. Considered something like ```lan=js +userIDsToFID: { +[userID: string]: string }, ``` for consistency with `FarcasterRelationshipRequest`, but think this approach is cleaner and we don't need validators/etc to ensure that there are only two entries in `userIDsToFID`, etc. --- Depends on D11624

Pretty straightforward, the `UpdateFarcasterMessageData` variant includes `creatorFID` and `targetFID`. Considered something like ```lang=js +userIDsToFID: { +[userID: string]: string }, ``` for consistency with `FarcasterRelationshipRequest`, but think this approach is cleaner and we don't need validators/etc to ensure that there are only two entries in `userIDsToFID`, etc. --- Depends on D11624

Pretty straightforward, the `UpdateFarcasterMessageData` variant includes `creatorFID` and `targetFID`. Considered something like ```lang=js +userIDsToFID: { +[userID: string]: string }, ``` for consistency with `FarcasterRelationshipRequest`, but think this approach is cleaner and we don't need validators/etc to ensure that there are only two entries in `userIDsToFID`, etc. --- Depends on D11624