Farcaster supports "rich" replies where a target message is actually mentioned. On Comm, we're handling this using markdown.
https://linear.app/comm/issue/ENG-11281/farcaster-replies
Depends on D15376
Details
Details
- Reviewers
kamil bartek ashoat - Commits
- rCOMM87fe8f02eeff: [lib] Display a reply
Send a message. Reply to it on both Comm and Farcaster. Check how the messages look in both apps.
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rCOMM Comm
- Lint
No Lint Coverage - Unit
No Test Coverage
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
How do we handle converting in the other direction? Ie. when a user uses the reply function in Comm for a Farcaster thread, we send the reply info correctly to the Farcaster backend. This part seems like it might be a bit harder since I think the Farcaster backend tracks replies based on message IDs instead of just simple Markdown
| lib/utils/convert-farcaster-message-to-comm-messages.js | ||
|---|---|---|
| 142 ↗ | (On Diff #50406) | I think we have code somewhere that already does this for when somebody swipes on a message |
Comment Actions
Currently, we don't create proper replies on Comm. Implementing this is more complicated, because of how we currently create replies - just the markdown. We would need to handle a target message ID... but also, on Comm a user could decide to edit a mentioned message after clicking the reply button.
So currently, when we reply on Comm, we will see a markdown message on Farcaster - it is visible on the screens from the summary.
Created https://linear.app/comm/issue/ENG-11289/farcaster-create-a-protocol-reply to track the proper solution.