Adding logic to use .wasm module on web.
Details
Details
- Reviewers
• jon michal tomek - Commits
- rCOMMee91a70f5226: [web] add database module to worker
Check if result is properly logged from web in prod/dev and desktop.
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rCOMM Comm
- Lint
No Lint Coverage - Unit
No Test Coverage
Event Timeline
web/database/worker/db-worker.js | ||
---|---|---|
80 ↗ | (On Diff #28302) | types will be added in subsequent diff |
keyserver/src/responders/website-responders.js | ||
---|---|---|
97 ↗ | (On Diff #28306) | The other properties have Filename as one word. Would be good to maintain consistency |
keyserver/src/responders/website-responders.js | ||
---|---|---|
138 ↗ | (On Diff #28306) | Can we try to match the convention of comm_opaque2_wasm_bg.wasm? So I guess it would be comm_query_executor.wasm |
web/database/worker/db-worker.js | ||
69 ↗ | (On Diff #28306) | Is this console.log accidentally left over from testing? If not, and you want to keep it, we should probably add some additional context to the message |
Comment Actions
improve naming convention
keyserver/src/responders/website-responders.js | ||
---|---|---|
97 ↗ | (On Diff #28306) | done! |
138 ↗ | (On Diff #28306) | We have two options:
I implemented option 2. |
web/database/worker/db-worker.js | ||
69 ↗ | (On Diff #28306) | left over, should've never been committed, removing |
keyserver/src/responders/website-responders.js | ||
---|---|---|
138 ↗ | (On Diff #28306) | Makes sense! |