[lib] Introduce updateRelationshipSpec
Needs ReviewPublic
Actions

Authored by ashoat on Thu, Sep 19, 3:47 PM.

Details

Reviewers

Summary

This addresses ENG-9329.

Depends on D13391

Test Plan

For now, just Flow. I'll test this at a later point in the stack; for now, putting up diffs following the team's recent pattern to get feedback

Repository

rCOMM Comm

Lint

No Lint Coverage

Unit

No Test Coverage

lib/shared/dm-ops/update-relationship-spec.js
103	One thing I'm curious about is whether we should introduce a new queue for FIDs / `AuxUserStore` Arguably we've derisked the possibility of a scenario where the message comes in before `FarcasterDataHandler` has a chance to update the `AuxUserStore`, since we're relying on `findUserIdentities` calls instead of `AuxUserStore`