Page MenuHomePhabricator

[web] Allow interaction with inline engagement from the thread pinned messages modal
ClosedPublic

Authored by rohan on Apr 11 2023, 6:09 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Nov 24, 3:44 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Nov 24, 3:14 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Nov 24, 3:13 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Nov 24, 2:50 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Nov 24, 2:30 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Nov 24, 12:29 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Nov 10, 8:14 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Nov 10, 7:08 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

When a user interacts with the inline engagement in the modal displaying pinned messages for the thread, we need to handle two cases: 1) keep the modal in the background when the reactions list is displayed, and 2) pop the modal when the replies engagement is clicked to navigate to the thread. The first is already handled by the nature of pushModal and popModal, but we need to handle the second one.

This diff pops the modal (if a modal exists) before navigating to the thread. This will also be useful for the message search implementation since I think the designs are closely shared (not too certain about it though).

Linear: https://linear.app/comm/issue/ENG-3450/allow-interaction-with-inline-engagement-from-thread-pinned-messages

There is a follow-up task to help refactor usability for the messages search screen here: https://linear.app/comm/issue/ENG-3644/refactor-file-names-details-to-make-the-thread-pin-modal-reusable-by

Depends on D7380

Test Plan

Before (Modal)

After (Modal)

After (Chat)

Diff Detail

Repository
rCOMM Comm
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

Harbormaster returned this revision to the author for changes because remote builds failed.Apr 11 2023, 6:23 AM
Harbormaster failed remote builds in B18230: Diff 24966!
rohan requested review of this revision.EditedApr 11 2023, 6:30 AM

Unblocking review since the failed test is from D7309 and I'm working on figuring that out (after that, I can fix the eslint warnings)

rohan added a reviewer: inka.

For now it is ok, but in the future we probably should introduce a prop that is e.g. a flag and tells InlineEngagement what should be done in reaction to the click. There might be some cases, in the future, where closing the modal is not desirable.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Apr 12 2023, 5:43 AM
web/chat/inline-engagement.react.js
52–54 ↗(On Diff #24966)

"Replies" isn't great naming... we typically use that terminology for the "quote-based" replies in the app, in contrast with "thread".

Can we maybe do this?

Also ESLint errors are concerning, we should get those resolved

Also ESLint errors are concerning, we should get those resolved

Will do - ran yarn eslint:fix web/ for each of the diffs in this stack, so the ESLint errors should be resolved in the updates (I'll double check this once I put up the revisions)

web/chat/inline-engagement.react.js
52–54 ↗(On Diff #24966)

Yeah makes sense, I'll update this

ESLint + Address Feedback

In D7382#220558, @rohan wrote:

Also ESLint errors are concerning, we should get those resolved

Will do - ran yarn eslint:fix web/ for each of the diffs in this stack, so the ESLint errors should be resolved in the updates (I'll double check this once I put up the revisions)

I think that will only fix "fixable" ESLint errors. Make sure you're testing locally that all ESLint errors are resolved