Page MenuHomePhabricator

clean up the repo a bit
ClosedPublic

Authored by varun on Dec 15 2022, 4:47 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F3494856: D5880.diff
Thu, Dec 19, 7:00 AM
F3491762: D5880.id19893.diff
Wed, Dec 18, 8:19 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Nov 20, 10:30 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Nov 19, 1:29 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Nov 19, 1:28 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Nov 19, 1:28 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Nov 19, 1:28 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Nov 19, 1:28 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

Moved our implementation of the opaque-ke CipherSuite trait to a separate library to avoid repeating ourselves.
Deleted opaque-ke-cxx which we didn't end up using.
Updated .gitignore files.

Test Plan

rebuilt everything that I refactored to use the new comm-opaque library and it worked fine

Diff Detail

Repository
rCOMM Comm
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

Harbormaster returned this revision to the author for changes because remote builds failed.Dec 15 2022, 4:50 PM
Harbormaster failed remote builds in B14197: Diff 19426!
Harbormaster returned this revision to the author for changes because remote builds failed.Dec 19 2022, 1:54 PM
Harbormaster failed remote builds in B14473: Diff 19728!
Harbormaster returned this revision to the author for changes because remote builds failed.Dec 20 2022, 3:06 PM
Harbormaster failed remote builds in B14587: Diff 19893!
varun edited reviewers, added: tomek; removed: atul. varun added 1 blocking reviewer(s): jon.Dec 20 2022, 3:07 PM

add newline to Cargo.toml

Harbormaster returned this revision to the author for changes because remote builds failed.Dec 20 2022, 3:10 PM
Harbormaster failed remote builds in B14589: Diff 19895!
varun requested review of this revision.Dec 20 2022, 3:23 PM
tomek added inline comments.
native/native_rust_library/Cargo.toml
17 ↗(On Diff #19895)

Do we still need this?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Dec 21 2022, 6:45 AM
This comment was removed by varun.
native/native_rust_library/Cargo.toml
17 ↗(On Diff #19895)

yeah because we use some other functions from this library directly

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.