Page MenuHomePhabricator

[lib] Introduce `useThreadFrozenDueToViewersBlock`
ClosedPublic

Authored by atul on Jun 3 2024, 12:40 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F3376781: D12287.diff
Wed, Nov 27, 2:07 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Nov 23, 12:34 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Nov 16, 1:10 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Nov 11, 6:43 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Nov 11, 12:33 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Nov 11, 6:39 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Nov 11, 3:41 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Nov 10, 11:21 PM
Subscribers
None

Details

Summary

We introduce a "hook version" of threadFrozenDueToViewersBlock which will allow us to set skipMemberAdminRoleCheck to true in the call to threadIsWithBlockedUserOnly in [web/native]/ChatInputBar and use the "updated" community role logic instead.


Depends on D12265

Test Plan

So far just flow and some log statements to ensure that value is as expected + same as before.

Diff Detail

Repository
rCOMM Comm
Branch
arcpatch-D12287
Lint
No Lint Coverage
Unit
No Test Coverage

Event Timeline

ViewersBlock -> ViewerBlock

atul published this revision for review.Jun 3 2024, 1:02 PM
lib/shared/thread-utils.js
943–945 ↗(On Diff #40896)

NOTE TO SELF: Make sure all the lodash stuff in useCommunityRootMembersToRole doesn't break when empty array is passed into useCommunityRootMembersToRole.

tomek added inline comments.
lib/shared/thread-utils.js
943–959 ↗(On Diff #40896)

Should we memoize some of these values?

944 ↗(On Diff #40896)

Does useCommunityRootMembersToRole memoize something? Is it ok to pass a new array to it on every render?

951–957 ↗(On Diff #40896)

How skipMemberAdminRoleCheck works? What is its relationship to memberHasAdminRole?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jun 4 2024, 1:23 AM
ashoat requested changes to this revision.Jun 4 2024, 10:39 AM

I'm concerned that the input to useCommunityRootMembersToRole is not being memoized

lib/shared/thread-utils.js
944 ↗(On Diff #40896)

From looking at the definition, I doubt that this is okay. This array almost certainly needs to be memoized

946 ↗(On Diff #40896)

Why is the first ?. necessary here? From looking at the definition of useCommunityRootMembersToRole, it never seems to return null or undefined

951–957 ↗(On Diff #40896)

I think the idea is that the code above is replacing the member admin role check

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Jun 4 2024, 10:39 AM
native/chat/chat-input-bar.react.js
705–708 ↗(On Diff #40896)

Can you reevaluate whether each of these props still need to be passed to the class component? It looks like at least communityThreadInfo can be removed, for instance

atul planned changes to this revision.Jun 4 2024, 1:03 PM

Local commit includes memoization/pruning of props. Will do a rebase and update this diff.

Add memoization to useThreadFrozenDueToViewerBlock

native/chat/chat-input-bar.react.js
705–708 ↗(On Diff #40896)

Removed communityThreadInfo and userInfos. threadInfo and viewerID still need to be passed in.

remove now extraneous communityThreadInfo and userInfos props in native/ChatInputBar

fix useCommunityRootMembersToRole logic

lib/shared/thread-utils.js
946 ↗(On Diff #40896)

Fixed this by having useCommunityRootMembersToRole return empty object instead of null/undefined if there are no community roots.

ashoat added inline comments.
lib/shared/thread-utils.js
974–977 ↗(On Diff #41225)

This doesn't need to be memoized

979–985 ↗(On Diff #41225)

This doesn't need to be memoized

946 ↗(On Diff #40896)

I don't think it ever returned null/undefined?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jun 12 2024, 8:56 AM

get rid of unneeded memoization

lib/shared/thread-utils.js
946 ↗(On Diff #40896)

Yeah it didn't, only the inner communityThreadInfo?.id needs to be accessed with ?..

Left early return in useCommunityRootMembersToRole since it doesn't hurt, but can remove if that's preferred.

This revision was landed with ongoing or failed builds.Jun 16 2024, 4:30 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.