Page MenuHomePhabricator

[web] Use plain Button instead of html elements
ClosedPublic

Authored by michal on Oct 11 2022, 7:17 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F3529633: D5343.diff
Tue, Dec 24, 8:30 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Dec 18, 11:00 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Dec 18, 11:00 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Dec 18, 11:00 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Dec 18, 11:00 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Dec 18, 10:58 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Dec 18, 10:46 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Nov 25, 8:17 PM
Subscribers

Details

Reviewers
tomek
atul
abosh
ginsu
Group Reviewers
Restricted Owners Package(Owns No Changed Paths)
Commits
rCOMM23cf6daf84b4: [web] Use plain Button instead of html elements
Summary

Part of ENG-843
Uses plain variant of Button introduced in a previous diff for most of the html <button>s and <div>s.

Test Plan

Check if all changed buttons look and work the same. Check if the changed css classes are used in other places.

Diff Detail

Repository
rCOMM Comm
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

Patched changes locally and all the buttons seem to work as before. good work. I would wait until @atul takes a look first before landing

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Oct 11 2022, 12:14 PM

Want to make sure one of the more experienced devs take a second look

This revision now requires review to proceed.Oct 11 2022, 12:16 PM
ginsu added a reviewer: Restricted Owners Package. ginsu removed 1 blocking reviewer(s): atul.Oct 11 2022, 12:23 PM
atul requested changes to this revision.Oct 11 2022, 5:15 PM

Looks close, some more memoization things that need to be addressed.

Check if all changed buttons look and work the same.

Wow that's a lot of buttons to check... I checked a few and they look correct, but I'll take your word on the rest. Please make sure you're fully confident that there are no visual regressions before landing.

I also didn't take a super thorough look at all of the styling changes, so please make sure that you're fully confident in all of them before landing.

web/apps/app-listing.react.js
56–59 ↗(On Diff #17490)

I'd personally prefer something like the following for symmetry:

const iconClasses = classnames({
  [css.appListingIconState]: true,
  [css.iconEnabled]: enabled,
  [css.iconDisabled]: !enabled,
});
web/components/menu-item.react.js
23 ↗(On Diff #17490)

Was this newline intentional?

(Totally fine if it was, just wanted to make sure)

25 ↗(On Diff #17490)

We don't want to be defining a function in onClick. We'd want to memoize it using the React.useCallback(...) hook.

What happens if we just pass onClick (the MenuItem prop) to onClick (the Button prop)?

web/settings/relationship/friend-list-row.react.js
26–29 ↗(On Diff #17490)

Let's memoize buttonColor using the React.useMemo(...) hook.

47–50 ↗(On Diff #17490)

Let's memoize buttonColor using the React.useMemo(...) hook

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Oct 11 2022, 5:15 PM

Update.

I tried to be as thorough as I could while testing, I will probably take another look at all the buttons before landing.

web/components/menu-item.react.js
23 ↗(On Diff #17490)

Yeah, I think it looks a bit nicer

25 ↗(On Diff #17490)

I thought it would be a problem because onClick (the MenuItem prop) could be void, while the Button prop only allowed null, but flow doesn't complain if I just pass it directly. Thanks for catching this.

web/settings/relationship/friend-list-row.react.js
26–29 ↗(On Diff #17490)

This color isn't dynamic, so I just moved it outside the component.

Looks good to me, please make sure you've taken a thorough look and are confident this diff doesn't lead to any visual regressions

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Oct 12 2022, 8:52 AM