As discussed in https://phabricator.ashoat.com/D4028#115409, we need to receive the device id from the client in order to properly generate the backup id.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rCOMM Comm
- Branch
- pass-device-id
- Lint
No Lint Coverage - Unit
No Test Coverage
Event Timeline
native/cpp/CommonCpp/grpc/protos/backup.proto | ||
---|---|---|
31–37 | At some point we should stop modifying the existing fields and only add a new ones. | |
services/backup/src/Reactors/server/CreateNewBackupReactor.cpp | ||
23–38 | I think it was discussed a couple of times, but having to send these one by one isn't too effective |
services/backup/src/Reactors/server/CreateNewBackupReactor.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
23–38 | I believe this is the task for this https://linear.app/comm/issue/ENG-1052/reconsider-using-oneof-in-services. I think we can do this separately. |
services/backup/src/Reactors/server/CreateNewBackupReactor.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
23–38 | It would be good to prioritize this task, but I agree it doesn't make sense to change in this diff |