Removed unused and deprecated requirements.
Fixed GTest include in Docker(Ubuntu) build.

Updating on a stack reordering.

Updating on the stack reordering.
Adding of services/tunnelbroker/src/libcpp/test/build directory to ignore the C++ gTest building cache.

Updating on the stack reordering.

Update on a stack reordering.

Fixing shared path, removing of unused commands, changes the stack order.

Updating stack dependencies.

Fixing include path to meet the Docker, adding of linking double-conversion and gflags for the building in Ubuntu Docker container.

In D5428#161080, @jon wrote:

The CI gates should be updated as part of this as well, having two failing gates isn't good.

I would also be fine with some additional diffs later in the stack which fix the builds later on, however, delaying being "green to green" also means that we will have a lot of intermediate diffs which fail to build or pass tests :(

Adding @ashoat as a final review.

Adding of prost and futures.

Removing of unused PathBuff.

Adding of -w flag to the C++ building process to suppress flooding of warnings.

Adding of Tunnelbroker[.h,.cpp] to the if-changed scope.

Adding @tomek as a final reviewer.

Adding @tomek as blocking.

Adding generated files.

Adding @tomek as a blocking here.

Fixing multiple reads.

Changes to use derive(Default), sandbox changed to is_sandbox, removing of unwrap().

Git-ignoring the tunnelbroker.ini looks reasonable to me, as well as updating the docs reflecting what the configuration file must contain. Thanks, @jon !

In D5265#155167, @ashoat wrote:

@max, before landing can you create a task to unify tonic version across the project and link it here?

Rebased on master changes.

I'm not a big fan of typedef too, but using fully qualified names here looks very ugly (looks like a Flutter-way ;) ).
If you guys think it looks ok and readable I'll remove the typdef here. I do not insist on it, it's just some prettifying.

Rebased on master changes.

In D5265#155121, @tomek wrote:

There are two different versions of the lib used in our project 0.8 and 0.6. We should try to keep them in sync, so it might be a good idea to upgrade the older ones at some point.

In D5265#155167, @ashoat wrote:

@max, before landing can you create a task to unify tonic version across the project and link it here?

In D5263#155118, @tomek wrote:

@max please add @marcin as a reviewer for Rust / C++ diffs - he will add me as a blocking reviewer after the diff is accepted.

In D5175#153316, @tomek wrote:

I'm still not sure if having this logic in get is the right approach. Added a comment about it in D5174 but accepting this diff because it looks ok