We now expect clients to get RoleInfos with the specialRole field included. We make the field required (it's still ?SpecialRole, so can be set to null) and make the necessary flow changes.
Depends on D11248
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rCOMM Comm
- Branch
- master
- Lint
No Lint Coverage - Unit
No Test Coverage
Event Timeline
| lib/types/minimally-encoded-thread-permissions-types.js | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37 ↗ | (On Diff #37873) | Maybe add an explicit null? |
Comment Actions
We ended up going with a very different approach from this stack. Abandoning to tidy things up.