- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
Fri, Nov 8
Sorry, you're absolutely right... that was my mistake, I mixed up FUTURE_CODE_VERSION and NEXT_CODE_VERSION
In D13888#388166, @ashoat wrote:Hmmmm this doesn't look right... the file on the left doesn't seem to be master
There's now an increasingly long list of "dangling" functions/types that can be removed:
Rebase, add invariants for encrypted uploads, remove more dead code: legacy calls
Hmmmm this doesn't look right... the file on the left doesn't seem to be master
Use version 389 as minimal
- Made primary device non-clickable
- Added pencil icons to editable items
- Refactored isThisDevice
- Made type readonly
Remove padding
Thanks for explaining and sharing the details & logs!
I talked with @tomek, and we concluded that I had previously done the test plan wrong, and the migration didn't actually run. In short, I was logging in with state version 85 from the beginning.
Rebase and rename
Make notificationsCreationData optional
Thu, Nov 7
I did not do any testing. @barthap will need to test this before landing, thoroughly this time.
- Split out legacyUnshimClientDB for existing usages
- Introduce new unshimClientDB
- Do the same for web
First, give this comment a read.
Reverted this diff because blob-hosted multimedia in thin threads will get shimmed by the keyserver to recent mobile clients.
minimal Cargo.lock update
add argon2 to root Cargo.toml
realize there's Rust code so @ashoat isn't a good reviewer