Would it make sense to add apply_immediately (at least for staging)? If I understand the documentation correctly, currently if we make changes to the user (or add broker configuration) we would have to reboot rabbitmq manually?

Is generic-ness of this is going to be helpful in the future? Or is it going to be always HyperWebsocket under the hood? Because in that case we should just remove the generics and use HyperWebsocket directly

Should we also update the docker-compose.yml to use the new port?

Nice!

LGTM, mostly just a rename

Probably moving policies logic from the responder itself to a higher place where we just avoid returning anything will make this code simpler - but since this will change in the future anyway (ENG-4137) it's okay the way it is

Merge

Small fixes

Amend test plan, don't set userID if not needed. Also added a log for clearing sensitive data.

Should we also update the docker-compose.yml to use the new port?

Thank you for fixing this!

Rename shouldRestart, start db intialization on load, add comment for transform migration

Change initError to notSupported, move safari key init after setting status to initInProgress

Instead of removing the previous migration, make it noop.

Change temporary docker repo to commapp

LGTM, could you check that it still works with something like this:

LGTM

More consistent vec creation

LGTM, would be good for someone working on identity to look over this

LGTM (would be nice to have ENG-4548)

Is there a reason for not building dependencies on another layer?

The whole native, with some exceptions, is already added.

Can we also add native/native_rust_library/target?

Adding tomek as blocking because of new deps. Left some comments regarding the rust code side, but I'm not really familiar with crypto so hoping someone else will also look at it

Landed D8966 so we can cancel this

Rebase, improve how we skip the latest backup when removing old backups (search for the backup with max creation time)

Rebase, fix typos, introduce get_named_text_field function

Would something like this work?

I'm probably going to land the test improvements this morning, but accepting if it's blocking someone. I will rebase over this diff if required. If I land first we cancel this

Fix constant